Is King Kong (1933) public domain?
Pre-1972 sound recordings can be protected under US state law and the Music Modernization Act until 2067 or later β the print being public domain does not free the recorded music.
π Download the print-layer research packet (Markdown) β citations you can attach to a dispute. Not legal advice; print layer only.
Rights, layer by layer
A film is not one copyright β it is several. Each layer below can be free or protected independently. This is why one-click βpublic domainβ answers are wrong so often.
| Film print (photoplay) | Active rights |
|
|---|---|---|
| Music score | Active rights |
|
| Underlying story / screenplay | Active rights |
|
| Character trademarks | Active rights |
|
| Restorations / re-releases | Active rights |
|
Background
King Kong is the film every creator should study before trusting a one-word public-domain answer β because its layers went to war in federal court. In 1982, Universal sued Nintendo claiming Donkey Kong infringed King Kong. Nintendo dug into the chain of title and found the empire had no clothes: the courts ruled Universal held no exclusive rights in the Kong story and had known it, and Nintendo won. (The novel's own public-domain status was settled earlier, in 1976, when a federal judge found its copyright had never been renewed; a follow-up ruling gave Merian C. Cooper's estate the rights in the Kong name and character outside the films.)
So today: the broad STORY of Kong is substantially free (the 1932 novel is public domain; the Kong name and character are claimed by the Cooper estate); the 1933 FILM β every frame, every roar of Steiner's score β is protected until January 1, 2029; and the KING KONG name is a live trademark. Three layers, three different answers, one giant ape. Mark your calendar for 2029.
Common questions
When does King Kong (1933) enter the public domain?
January 1, 2029 β 95 years after its 1933 publication. This page will update automatically when it happens.
Is any part of King Kong free right now?
The broad character and story are substantially unprotected β Universal v. Nintendo found no one held exclusive Kong story rights. (Caveat: whether the specific 1932 novelization is cleanly public domain is itself disputed, so rely on the general public-domain story rather than that single book.) The film's footage, images, and score are protected until 2029, and KING KONG trademarks remain active indefinitely.
Didn't Universal lose a lawsuit about this?
Yes β they sued Nintendo over Donkey Kong in 1982 and lost precisely because the Kong story's copyright chain had lapsed. The case is the classic proof that studios' rights claims deserve verification.